Sourabh Rodagi

Sourabh Rodagi

Data Analytics in SQL, Python, DBT, Snowflake

LinkedIn creator · United States · 8.1K followers
Open to collaborations

Companies pay Sourabh to write a post about their product on LinkedIn.

This page is where they book it. Below: Sourabh's audience, recent posts and price. Naano, the platform behind this page, handles the brief, your approval of the post and the payment.

€444per post, fixed price

You approve the post before it goes live

Book Sourabh

Looking for Sourabh? View LinkedIn profileA creator yourself? Create your own page

About Sourabh Rodagi

I am Analyst Interested in turning ambiguous business questions into decisions leadership can act on. What I do ▸ Build AI automation and the validation layers that make output trustworthy ▸ Design data pipelines and dbt models on Snowflake and PostgreSQL ▸ Ship dashboards in Power BI, Tableau, and TypeScript that teams run themselves ▸ Turn undefined problems into scoped analyses, from zero infrastructure Impact ▸ Cut $40K/month of manual clinic work ▸ Reduced data errors 70% on 1.4M records ▸ Returned 20 hrs/week to a client team See the work: https://www.sourabhrodagi.com

SoftwareData / Analytics

My LinkedIn audience

Followers
8,118
Avg impressions/post
47.6
Top 13 exported posts · median 3
Engagement
1.3%

LinkedIn export · Oct 27, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026 · Provided by the creator, not independently verified by Naano

  • Yesterday I read Uber Freight Engineering team's blog on scaling data systems with clear ownership. Here are 3 things stuck with me. (materialised for Data Analysts/Engineers) 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁: Uber Freight operates as a massive logistics platform managing over $18 billion in freight, where 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒍-𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝒗𝒊𝒔𝒊𝒃𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚 across carriers, shippers, and internal operations is critical. To support this, their architecture runs on over 40 highly heterogeneous microservices pulling from nearly 100 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒅𝒂𝒕𝒂𝒃𝒂𝒔𝒆𝒔 and external APIs. Their central search platform processes thousands of complex, ad-hoc queries per second across millions of active freight shipments with 𝒑99 𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒊𝒆𝒔 under a few hundred milliseconds and data freshness within seconds. Here are my 3 key takeaways. (materialised for Data Analysts/Engineers) Grain-First Modeling: Define the row-level primary key (like load_id) before writing SQL. Establishing exact granularity upfront prevents fan-out bugs, duplicate counts, and bad joins down the line. Upstream Data Validation: Don't rely on users to spot broken dashboard metrics. Build automated assertion tests directly into ingestion pipelines to catch source schema drift before it hits your reports. Pre-Denormalize for Speed: Stop running heavy multi-table JOINs at query time. Pre-stitching multi-source fragments into flat materialized tables trades cheap storage for sub-second query performance. #uber #dataanalysis #Learning

    7 reactions · 0 commentsView
  • Everyone wants AI to save them months(time). Very few teams actually get there. Capital One did: 9 months of analysis → 10 days. But AI wasn’t the first step. Clean data was. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 Big companies rent thousands of things in the cloud: servers, storage, IP addresses. Projects end. People move on. The bills don’t. Capital One had ~350 kinds of cloud services to check for waste. The catch: “unused” looks different for every kind. Get it wrong, and you switch off something people rely on. By hand, the estimate was 6–9 months. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝗱 🟩 1. Clean, trusted data first One documented daily list of everything they rent. The AI can only be as good as the data it reads. 🟪 2. AI checks every kind It wrote a rule to spot “unused” and rated its own confidence: high, medium or low. 🟧 3. An expert checks every unsure answer The AI was fast but not always right. It referenced data that didn’t exist and was overconfident. The expert caught it before anything went live. 𝗧𝘄𝗼 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 A switched-off server → AI: unused (high confidence) → expert confirms → savings. A storage bucket untouched for 90 days → AI: unused? (medium) → expert finds it’s still used daily → kept. Case A is where AI saves time. Case B is where the expert saves you from an outage. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 → 18–27x faster, even including human review → 12 of 350 kinds (3.6%) held 30–40% of the savings → “Untouched for X days” rules were wrong 40–60% of the time for services that stay in use without changes 𝗠𝘆 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 AI on messy data doesn’t save time. It just makes mistakes faster. Most teams start with the model. The ones who win start with the data. 𝟰 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗼𝘄 1. Pick one trusted, documented data source before you add AI 2. Make the AI rate its confidence and explain why 3. Route every medium and low answer to a human expert 4. Trust clear signals (“switched off”) over age-based guesses (“untouched 90 days”) This works far beyond cloud costs: data quality checks, access reviews, policy audits. Agree, or is “data first” overrated? Full Capital One article in the comments. #AI #DataQuality #Analytics #DataEngineering

    6 reactions · 3 commentsView
  • If I had to relearn SQL from scratch, I’d follow 6 steps. Foundation first. Then real problems. Then building. 1️⃣ Learn the concepts: CS50 SQL (Harvard, free) 2️⃣ Write your first queries: SQLBolt 3️⃣ Drill the core patterns: LeetCode SQL 50 4️⃣ Solve real interview questions: DataLemur or StrataScratch 5️⃣ Practice explaining out loud: Aced peer mock interviews 6️⃣ Build a project. Mine: a clinic marketing research dashboard. → Pulled clinic data from the Google and Yelp APIs → Ran data quality checks in Python + SQL → Stored it in a SQL database → Built the dashboard on top Courses teach syntax. Projects prove you can use it. All links, plus my GitHub, are in the first comment 👇 Which step are you on? #SQL #DataAnalytics #LearnSQL

    10 reactions · 2 commentsView

Work with Sourabh Rodagi

Choose a format for your next LinkedIn collaboration.

Sponsored LinkedIn post

A dedicated post to introduce your brand to my audience.

€444

LinkedIn repost

Reposts your LinkedIn post to my network.

€88

Repost with comment

Reposts your LinkedIn post with my own comment.

€113
Book Sourabh

Your collaboration, managed on Naano

  • Share your brief with the creator
  • Review the content before publication
  • Manage your collaboration and payment
Create your brand account to continue. You can review the collaboration details before committing.

How does this price compare? B2B creator rates 2026

Who sees my posts

People who saw my posts, from my LinkedIn export.

Data Engineer8%
Sales Recruiter8%
Software Engineer5%
Data Analyst2%

Storefront by Naano · Create yours

Booking Sourabh Rodagi: frequently asked questions

Sourabh Rodagi is a B2B LinkedIn creator based in the United States with 8,118 followers, posting about Software and Data / Analytics. On Naano, one sponsored LinkedIn post by Sourabh Rodagi costs €444, a fixed price per post.

How much does Sourabh Rodagi charge for a sponsored LinkedIn post?
One sponsored LinkedIn post with Sourabh Rodagi costs €444 on Naano. It is a fixed price per post, the amount your brand pays. Compare with the B2B creator rates 2026 report
How do I book Sourabh Rodagi?
Create a brand account on Naano, choose an offer on this page and send your brief. The price is held when Sourabh Rodagi accepts and paid when the post URL is submitted. You can turn on draft approval to review the post before it goes live.
Can Naano run the campaign for me?
Yes. With Managed Campaigns, the Naano team sets the strategy, casts the creators, writes the briefs, reviews the drafts, pays the creators and reports results per creator and campaign. It is a three-month programme: a management fee from €3,000 per month, plus a creator budget from €6,000 per month. See Managed Campaigns

Want Naano to run the whole campaign?

The Naano team casts the creators, writes the briefs, reviews every draft with you and reports results per creator. You approve the shortlist and every draft.

See Managed Campaigns
€444per postBook Sourabh