Arpit Singh

Arpit SinghSep 30, 2026

I run prospecting for five clients. Each one has a different ICP. That used to mean five mental models, five tabs open, five workflows running at once. Now it means one chat window. Every client I work with sells to a different audience. SaaS founders. RevOps leads. Agency owners. Mid-market CMOs. Each one needs different filters, different messaging, different sequences. For years, that meant context switching all day: ✦ Open Apollo.io Set filters for Client A. ✦ Switch to LinkedIn. Check the personas. ✦ Jump to Claude. Draft the outreach. ✦ Back to Apollo. Build the sequence. ✦ Close everything. Open it all again for Client B. ✦ Repeat. Five times. Every day. Context switching has a real cost. It's not the seconds you lose clicking tabs. It's the ten minutes your brain takes to remember which ICP you were even on. Now my workflow lives inside Claude: ↳ I tell it which client I'm working on. ↳ Apollo.io pulls contacts matching that ICP from inside the chat. ↳ It enriches them. Checks intent signals. ↳ I draft the outreach in the same window. ↳ Push the list straight into an Apollo sequence. ↳ Move to the next client. Same window. New conversation. Same Apollo data. Same sequences. No tab juggling. No mental reset between accounts. The work that used to fill a morning now fits between two calls. → Apollo.io is now inside Claude (and ChatGPT, HubSpot, Salesforce, Gmail, and Chrome too). If you're done bouncing between tabs. Here’s the link: https://lnkd.in/dpENzB4t What does your morning prospecting look like right now when you're juggling more than one account? 👇 #ApolloPartner #ApolloAnywhere

Arpit SinghSep 22, 2026

I tested 8 lead databases so you don’t have to. (And I’m giving you the benchmark + outbound playbook. FREE.) 600 leads. 8 data providers. One independent verifier. I submitted the same batch of leads to every provider. Then every email that came back was checked by a third-party verifier. No provider got to grade its own homework. Here’s how Prospeo performed: → 98.8 Global Score → 66% valid email coverage → 100% of returned emails passed the inbox check → 70% mobile coverage → $5 per 1,000 emails → $55 per 1,000 mobiles The interesting part? You’re getting coverage + deliverability + pricing in a pretty strong package. So I partnered with Prospeo to turn the test into something more useful than another benchmark. I put together a free outbound resource pack with: → How to build lead lists through MCP → Cold call opener guide → Full 6-email sequence guide → Agency retainer guide → The complete data benchmark And there’s one more thing: 50% OFF Prospeo’s yearly plan. It’s an exclusive offer for my audience and isn’t available elsewhere. Grab it here: https://lnkd.in/e-N5xjj6 No complicated form. Just the good stuff. 😄

Arpit SinghSep 25, 2026

The first tool I used for outbound just launched Agents V2. Yep, I’m talking about Instantly.ai Back when I was starting out, my workflow was pretty simple: → Find leads → Build a campaign → Write the sequence → Send → Repeat And honestly, Instantly did that job really well. It’s still one of the best outbound tools I’ve used. But V2 is taking it somewhere much more interesting. The agentic era of GTM is officially here. From sending outreach to actually running the work behind it. Now, agents can: → Research companies → Find the right people → Enrich data → Score leads against your ICP → Decide what to do next → Send the outreach → And even make the call You can also describe what you want an agent to do in plain English and build the workflow around it. That’s the shift I’m most interested in. We’re going from: “Which tools do I need to build this workflow?” to: “What do I actually want this system to do?” For me, the interesting part is that I can now automate more than just the outreach. I can automate the work that happens around it too. Instantly.ai Agents V2 is live now. If you’re building outbound or GTM systems, I’d give it a try. 20% off with ARPT20: https://lnkd.in/er8qYGqE #InstantlyPartner