Sponsored LinkedIn post
A dedicated post to introduce your brand to my audience.
Forward Deployed Engineer | Turning Business Problems into AI Solutions 8x-m7d343
Vaishnavi is a creator on Naano, where companies pay creators to write posts about their product.
Below: Vaishnavi's audience and recent posts.
€500per post, fixed price
You approve the post before it goes live
Looking for Vaishnavi? View LinkedIn profileView X profileA creator yourself? Create your own page
I take customer problems from conversation to production. Engineer with hands-on experience across AWS, GCP, Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker, and CI/CD. I enjoy working close to the problem understanding requirements, building solutions, and getting them into production. ▫️ Turn requirements into working solutions ▫️ Build, deploy, debug, and iterate ▫️ Automate workflows and improve reliability ▫️ Work across DevOps, AI, MLOps, and AI infrastructure I’ve grown a 21K+ developer audience on X by sharing practical engineering insights and learning in public. Currently focused on Forward Deployed Engineering and AI-native systems. I build, ship and explain.
My most engaged audience
87% Engineering / Data
From 32 people who reacted to or commented on my posts
Public LinkedIn data · Oct 31, 2026
X
Public X data · Captured Oct 31, 2026
Bangalore devs, do you agree....? 😂
Andrej Karpathy said we should stop thinking of LLMs as chatbots Think of them as the kernel of a new operating system. That idea is becoming much more practical in 2026 Local LLM engineering is no longer just about running a model. It’s about building an always-on AI system on your own machine. Think: ▫️ Model → cognitive core ▫️ Context → RAM ▫️ Files → storage ▫️ Tools/MCP → peripherals ▫️ Agents → processes Local models can already handle: → Coding → Private document Q&A → Ticket triage → Data extraction → Coding agents → Overnight automation But model size isn't everything. Memory determines what you can load Bandwidth determines how fast it runs Context determines how much it can see Quantization determines the memory cost Utilization determines whether the hardware is worth it And you don't need one giant model for everything Small local model → routine tasks Larger local model → serious private work Frontier API → genuinely difficult reasoning The goal isn't to replace cloud AI. It's to give the right task to the right model The interesting question isn't: “Can I run an LLM locally?” It's: “What should my machine be doing while I sleep..?” 👀
Vibe coders build software using AI Reverse engineers figure out how existing software works & rebuild it If both can create software, where is the software engineering industry heading..? 👀
Choose a format for your next LinkedIn collaboration.
A dedicated post to introduce your brand to my audience.
Not taking bookings on LinkedIn right now.
Choose a format for your next X collaboration.
A dedicated post to introduce your brand to my audience.
Not taking bookings on X right now.
Your collaboration, managed on Naano
How does this price compare? B2B creator rates 2026
Based on 32 people who reacted to or commented on my posts. Percentages use the profiles that could be classified.
Based on 32 people who reacted to or commented on my posts. Percentages use the profiles that could be classified.
Based on 32 people who reacted to or commented on my posts. Percentages use the profiles that could be classified.
Sample of 300 public X follower profiles. Public X data, not the audience of a specific post. This follower sample is partial.
X
Childhood: Dreamed of becoming an engineer 12th: COVID hit College: AI entered the chat Graduated: AI started taking jobs Job hunt: 500 applicants for one opening We really went through all this just to become engineers 💀 What a great loop
https://t.co/yYKdnO0gbI
A PAPER JUST DECLARED THE END OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING. ITS OWN DATA SAYS AGENTS STILL CAN'T MAINTAIN A CODEBASE. the argument: code stops being the product and becomes disposable tooling. agents write it, run it, throw it away → old flow: ai → software → result → new flow: agent → result → engineers turn into intent architects, agent coordinators and outcome auditors but the evidence it cites cuts both ways: → agents clear 80%+ on isolated tasks → drop to 38% at best when they have to keep evolving the same codebase commit after commit → context drift, compounding errors, no sense of tech debt writing code is getting cheap. maintaining it isn't. so what's actually ending: the engineer, or the 10-year-old monolith nobody wants to touch?
OpenAI is shutting down Prism, its free LaTeX tool for scientists https://t.co/9sWlomjJL0
bro got rejected for the one question they didn't ask 👀 https://t.co/laTXS0qhyY
Storefront by Naano · Create yours
Vaishnavi Tikke is a B2B LinkedIn creator based in India with 8,505 followers, posting about Software, AI, and Productivity. On Naano, one sponsored LinkedIn post by Vaishnavi Tikke costs €500, a fixed price per post. A sponsored X post costs €500. Vaishnavi Tikke is not taking new bookings right now.
The Naano team casts the creators, writes the briefs, reviews every draft with you and reports results per creator. You approve the shortlist and every draft.