Ignacio P.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 👇 Pulled from the shift already underway: marketers who open Claude Code operate a system. The ones who do not stay as fast as they are now. What's inside: 1/ The old way, and why it is breaking You open the chat app. It writes the post. You go post it. It runs the audit. You spend the afternoon doing it. It gives you the report. You pull the numbers yourself. The copy-paste is the work, and it is not your judgment, it is your labor. 2/ The new way A version of Claude that does the work instead of describing it. Opens your files. Connects to your tools. Runs on a schedule while you sleep. Same intelligence. The only difference is whether you carry the work or it does. 3/ The 3 powers Act in your real tools, not just write the email. Touch your real files, not just tell you the format. Run unattended on a schedule, not just respond when you ask. Each removes a different chunk of the manual work between you and the result. 4/ The setup that makes it run The brain file that grounds every run in your business. The connectors that give it hands. The auto mode that runs the safe middle without babysitting. The schedule that makes it work while you sleep. 5/ The 3 builds in order The foundation: where the work runs unattended. The first real workflow: a job you do by hand, taken off your hands. The plugins: new skills installed in one click. Each is a step up from doing the work to running a system. 6/ The forces making it inevitable The chat app advises. Claude Code presses the buttons, with you deciding which. The gap between marketers who open the Code tab and the ones who never do is about to be the widest skill gap in the field. 7/ The first three moves to start now Open the desktop app and the Code tab. Write your first CLAUDE.md in plain English. Run one workflow you currently do by hand and watch it run without you. Whatever size you are today. The pattern in every build: the AI does the work, you keep the judgment. The honest part is in the guide, including why most marketers will not open Claude Code and what that does to the skill gap. Comment "GUIDE" and I will DM you the guide. Connect with me first so it sends. Save this post for early access. 🔖

BREAKING: I just built the Claude Dealflow Playbook for VCs to find the 0.01% deals 👇 Most VC partners spend their week on deals they will pass. The fix is not to source harder. The fix is to score every inbound against your thesis before a partner reads a single deck. Comment "DEALFLOW" and I will send you the playbook. What is inside: → The triage problem: where the partner's week actually goes → The four sources of dealflow, and how your mix shifts once the loop runs → The 7-axis screening rubric, with the cut points → The automation layer: every inbound scored before it reaches a partner → The human layer: where taste still wins → The dealflow stack, the named tools end to end → The anti-portfolio loop: a 90-day re-score on every founder you passed → A paste-ready Claude project that runs the whole thing The triage shrinks. The hit rate per first meeting goes up. The calendar comes back, spent on taste, not admin. Same loop we wire for the funds we work with. 1️⃣ Like this post 2️⃣ Comment "DEALFLOW" 3️⃣ Connect so I can send you the link P.S. Repost and tag a partner spending their week on triage right now 🚀

JUST DROPPED: The 450 named Funds of Funds & Family Offices decision makers 👇 Family offices and funds of funds across 4 lists. The people who actually write checks into funds. Here is what is inside: → 100 Funds of Funds → 100 Fund of Funds Allocating to VC and PE → 100 Family Offices in Europe → 150 Family Offices Allocating to Funds Breakdown: → Funds of Funds: 200 named decision makers → Family Offices: 250 named decision makers → Total: 450 LPs across 4 lists What you get with the index: → Every LP list we have published, side by side → The decision tree: Fund I vs Fund III, VC vs PE, US vs Europe → The 3 combination plays GPs use to stack the lists into one campaign → Direct access to every list from one place Same library we use to run outreach for the funds we work with. Comment "LP" and I will send you the index. 1️⃣ Like this post 2️⃣ Comment "LP" 3️⃣ Connect so I can send you the link P.S. Repost and tag a fund manager raising their next vintage right now 🚀

500+ funds, startups, and real estate sponsors in our first 60 days. When we launched 8Raise, the bet was simple. Raising capital does not have to mean cold lists, dead inboxes, and guessing who actually writes checks. It should mean the right investors, the warm path, and a process that runs even when you step away from the desk. Sixty days in, the founders, fund managers, and sponsors raising with 8Raise have told us the bet was right. Here is what 500+ of them are now running on: → A curated, verified investor base, not a scraped list nobody answers → Three modes built for how capital actually moves: VC, Real Estate, and LP To everyone who trusted us in the first 60 days: thank you. You did the hard part. We are just making the next 60 faster. If you are raising a round, a fund, or a deal, this is the moment to assemble your stack. From first outreach to funded. 🔗 www.8raise.com

Couple days ago, Jake Paul and Logan Paul closed an oversubscribed $100M growth fund. Anti Fund, with Geoffrey Woo and Jake Paul as managing partners and Logan as GP, is now past $180M in AUM, just six months after its $30M Fund I. The model is a barbell: small first checks into technical founders, then $10M+ growth checks into the ones that break out. Growth already holds OpenAI, Anduril, SpaceX, Cognition, and Helion. The verticals tell you exactly where the money's headed: → AI → Defense → Robotics → Energy → Frontier infrastructure Read it as a founder raising. Anti Fund's own thesis: capital is a commodity, attention is not. The Pauls didn't out-capital anyone. They turned reach into access, and access into a fund. You don't need 20M followers to borrow that move. You need reach to the right investors before consensus gets there. And that's the whole game we help founders run: not more capital, more access to the people who write the checks. Smart capital moving into deep tech, or a top-of-cycle tell?