Steven Claes

Steven Claes

CHRO (Chief Human Resources Officer) | Driving People Strategy, Culture & Growth | Montea @ Montea

LinkedIn creator · Belgium · 174.6K followers
Open to collaborations

Companies pay Steven to write a post about their product on LinkedIn.

This page is where they book it. Below: Steven's audience, recent posts and price. Naano, the platform behind this page, handles the brief, your approval of the post and the payment.

€4,375per post, fixed price

or 2 posts for €6,250 · You approve the post before it goes live

Book Steven

Looking for Steven? View LinkedIn profileA creator yourself? Create your own page

About Steven Claes

CHRO | Introvert Leadership & Career Growth for Ambitious Introverts | The A+ Introvert Newsletter

“Speak up.” “Be more visible.” “You’re too quiet for this role.” I heard this for 15 years. Then I became CHRO, helping introverts and quiet leaders grow their careers without changing their personality. Through SC4People, I serve as CHRO at Montea, a BEL 20 logistics real estate company (stock quoted). Alongside that, I write The A+ Introvert, a newsletter read by thousands of professionals every Saturday, 160,000+ followers. Not because I’m loud. Because I’m consistent. Who I help: → Introverts who want career growth, promotions, and visibility without burnout → Quiet leaders navigating executive roles, career transitions, and personal branding → People-first companies building inclusive cultures where introvert talent thrives How I work: → I’m building an introvert accelerator for those who want to lead without pretending, and become visible, influential, and promotable → In parallel, I work with organizations to redesign leadership environments so that high-quality thinking doesn’t get lost in noise I help introverts become visible and influential. Then I help organizations stop overlooking them. What I believe: I want introverts to grow in full respect of their introvert nature, without shrinking themselves for others and without blaming or sidelining the extroverts around them. What you’ll find here: ↳ Daily posts on introvert leadership, quiet confidence, and energy management ↳ Saturday deep-dives in The A+ Introvert Newsletter ↳ Real frameworks from 20+ years in HR leadership, executive coaching, talent strategy, and culture transformation "I write because I don’t know what I think until I read what I say." 📩 Follow me or subscribe and get my workbook from Invisible to Unforgettable: www.aplusintrovert.com/from-invisible-to-unforgettable Your next breakthrough might be sitting silently in the corner.

B2BRecruiting / TalentProductivity

My LinkedIn audience

Followers
174,625
Est. median reach
62K
Reactions per post
465
Median of recent posts

My most engaged audience

55% Founder / C-level · 22% Engineering / Data

From 398 people who reacted to or commented on my posts

Public LinkedIn data · Sep 21, 2026

  • The hardest thing to tell an introvert who is performing extroversion at work is that it is working. It works, which is exactly why nobody in the company ever has to change anything. I have sat in a version of this conversation many times. Someone says about a candidate: "He really came alive in that presentation." The room nods. He gets the role. Read the left column of that whiteboard again. Every line on it is something the job asked him for, and he delivered all ten. For years I let that sentence pass. Now I ask which decision got better. The room usually goes quiet. Because a senior role is never only the work. It carries an unwritten spec inherited from whoever held it last: how often they were in the corridor, how they opened a meeting, how fast they answered. Nobody writes that down. Everybody calibrates against it. So the promotion arrives as a reward and then becomes a contract. Perform at that level, at that frequency, for as long as you hold the role, and there is no mechanism anywhere in the company for handing the contract back. Three years later he leaves, and we code it as balance, and we lose the judgement that got him promoted. The cost of a badly designed room belongs to the people who designed it. We have spent years charging that cost to the individual instead, and calling that development. → Write the role spec before you name candidates, then strike every line that describes the last holder rather than the work. → When someone says a candidate came alive, ask which decision got better. Up to you to decide what your last succession slate was actually measuring. Your room may not change this year, and you still have a career to run in the meantime. If you're interested in more, join the A+introvert newsletter for weekly free introvert & leadership insights. Subscribe here 👇. https://lnkd.in/en59EKuG

    1.5K reactions · 0 commentsView
  • Being reachable all day is a poor measure of work. Your best work may require the opposite.   A workplace that treats that as a problem has confused presence with contribution.   Have a good weekend. Join the A+introvert community - weekly free deeply introvert career & leadership insights: https://lnkd.in/en59EKuG

    913 reactions · 239 commentsView
  • You can meet every requirement for promotion and still be told: "One more thing." I've sat in talent conversations where someone was told exactly what they needed to prove. They proved it, and then the requirement changed. Nobody described it as moving the goalposts. It was usually presented more politely: "One more thing." Good promotion systems make the standard visible before the employee starts chasing it. A manager should be able to explain what the next level requires, what evidence counts, when readiness will be reviewed and who is involved in the decision. If those things only become clear after somebody has met the previous expectation, the process is teaching them that progress doesn't necessarily move them closer. A moving target also selects for a particular kind of person. When the criteria stay vague, the only way to find out where the line has gone is to keep asking in the room, repeatedly, in front of the people who decide. That suits the colleague who is comfortable relitigating their own case and quietly disadvantages the one who went away and built exactly the evidence they were asked for. Written criteria, a known review date and a named decision-maker take that advantage away. People can focus on building the right evidence instead of trying to read the room. If you're told you need "more leadership" or "more visibility," ask what that looks like in observable terms, and if the requirement changes later, ask what changed and why. A development plan should make progress easier to see. If the finish line keeps moving, stop calling it development. I write more about workplace systems like this in my free weekly newsletter for introverts, as well as extroverts who want to understand how those systems land differently. I cover visibility, meetings, leadership and progression, and the unwritten rules that shape who gets heard and who gets ahead. If you’d like to read it, you can join here: https://lnkd.in/en59EKuG

    465 reactions · 221 commentsView

Work with Steven Claes

Choose a format for your next LinkedIn collaboration.

Sponsored LinkedIn post

A dedicated post to introduce your brand to my audience.

€4,375

2 LinkedIn posts

A series of posts to build visibility over time.

€6,250

LinkedIn repost

Reposts your LinkedIn post to my network.

€625

Repost with comment

Reposts your LinkedIn post with my own comment.

€1,250
Book Steven

Your collaboration, managed on Naano

  • Share your brief with the creator
  • Review the content before publication
  • Manage your collaboration and payment
Create your brand account to continue. You can review the collaboration details before committing.

How does this price compare? B2B creator rates 2026

Who engages with my posts

Based on 398 people who reacted to or commented on my posts. Percentages use the profiles that could be classified.

Founder / C-level55%
Senior IC17%
Manager / Lead16%
VP / Head / Director12%

Past partnerships

What I offer

Can work both for a single post, multiple post or combined Linkedin post with Linkedin newsletter or Beehiiv newsletter. Currently have a joined 60K+ subscriber base in newsletters and Beehiiv 60% open rate.

Time from booking to post

I publish within 2 weeks if no other slots taken

The A+Introvert - Linkedin newsletter and Beehiiv newsletter

Potential for sponsoring into these weekly newsletter: Linkedin: 58K subscribers Beehiiv: 5K subscribers (55-60% open rate - 3-5% CTR)

Storefront by Naano · Create yours

Booking Steven Claes: frequently asked questions

Steven Claes is a B2B LinkedIn creator based in Belgium with 174,625 followers, posting about Recruiting / Talent and Productivity. On Naano, one sponsored LinkedIn post by Steven Claes costs €4,375, a fixed price per post.

How much does Steven Claes charge for a sponsored LinkedIn post?
One sponsored LinkedIn post with Steven Claes costs €4,375 on Naano. It is a fixed price per post, the amount your brand pays. Packs of several posts are listed in the offers above. Compare with the B2B creator rates 2026 report
How do I book Steven Claes?
Create a brand account on Naano, choose an offer on this page and send your brief. The price is held when Steven Claes accepts and paid when the post URL is submitted. You can turn on draft approval to review the post before it goes live.
Can Naano run the campaign for me?
Yes. With Managed Campaigns, the Naano team sets the strategy, casts the creators, writes the briefs, reviews the drafts, pays the creators and reports results per creator and campaign. It is a three-month programme: a management fee from €3,000 per month, plus a creator budget from €6,000 per month. See Managed Campaigns

Want Naano to run the whole campaign?

The Naano team casts the creators, writes the briefs, reviews every draft with you and reports results per creator. You approve the shortlist and every draft.

See Managed Campaigns
€4,375per postBook Steven